
Core i9-13900HK
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900HK
2023Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,217 vs 27,318).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $697 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌462.5% higher power demand at 45W vs 8W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 45W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i9-13900HK
2023Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 45W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,217 vs 27,318).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $697 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌462.5% higher power demand at 45W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS better than Core i9-13900HK?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900HK | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900HK | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 553 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 416 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 279 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900HK | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900HK | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 680 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 680 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 680 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 672 FPS | 683 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 680 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 680 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 552 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900HK and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Core i9-13900HK
Core i9-13900HK
The Core i9-13900HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 27,217 points. Launch price was $697.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900HK packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13900HK has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900HK versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900HK (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i9-13900HK uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900HK scores 27,217 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,629 vs 2,605, a 0.9% lead for the Core i9-13900HK that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900HK vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.
| Feature | Core i9-13900HK | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+4% | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 4 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 8 MB+300% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 27,217 | 27,318 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,629 | 2,605 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,348 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900HK uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Core i9-13900HK supports up to 96 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core i9-13900HK) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — the Core i9-13900HK offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i9-13900HK) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).
| Feature | Core i9-13900HK | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB+50% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900HK) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Core i9-13900HK) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i9-13900HK | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












