
Core i7-14701TE
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-14701TE
2024Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $392 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌462.5% higher power demand at 45W vs 8W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 45W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,318 vs 27,519).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 33 MB).
Core i7-14701TE
2024Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 45W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $392 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌462.5% higher power demand at 45W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,318 vs 27,519).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 33 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-14701TE better than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-14701TE | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-14701TE | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 364 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-14701TE | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 688 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 643 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 562 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 688 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-14701TE | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 688 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 688 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 688 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 687 FPS | 683 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 688 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 688 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 621 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 549 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 568 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 516 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 462 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-14701TE and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Core i7-14701TE
Core i7-14701TE
The Core i7-14701TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,519 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-14701TE and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-14701TE versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i7-14701TE uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-14701TE scores 27,519 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-14701TE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,781 vs 2,605, a 6.5% lead for the Core i7-14701TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14701TE vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.
| Feature | Core i7-14701TE | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 4 GHz+90% |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB (total)+106% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 8 MB+300% |
| Process | 10 nm | 4 nm-60% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 27,519 | 27,318 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,781+7% | 2,605 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,348 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-14701TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-14701TE supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i7-14701TE) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).
| Feature | Core i7-14701TE | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-14701TE) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-14701TE) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-14701TE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i7-14701TE rivals Ryzen Embedded 8000.
| Feature | Core i7-14701TE | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | Yes |
| Target Use | Embedded/Industrial | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











