
Core i5-14600T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-14600T
2024Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,238 vs 27,318).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $255 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌337.5% higher power demand at 35W vs 8W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 35W, a 27W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i5-14600T
2024Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 35W, a 27W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,238 vs 27,318).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $255 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌337.5% higher power demand at 35W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS better than Core i5-14600T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-14600T | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-14600T | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 224 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-14600T | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-14600T | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 681 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 681 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 636 FPS | 683 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 681 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 592 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 522 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 529 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 480 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14600T and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Core i5-14600T
Core i5-14600T
The Core i5-14600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,238 points. Launch price was $255.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14600T packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-14600T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i5-14600T versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 1.8 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-14600T uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14600T scores 27,238 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 0.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,626 vs 2,605, a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-14600T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14600T vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.
| Feature | Core i5-14600T | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.2 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 4 GHz+122% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 8 MB+300% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 27,238 | 27,318 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,626 | 2,605 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,348 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14600T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i5-14600T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-14600T) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).
| Feature | Core i5-14600T | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-14600T) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-14600T) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14600T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-14600T rivals Ryzen 7 7700.
| Feature | Core i5-14600T | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | Yes |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












