PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-14490F

2024

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (2,510 vs 16,000).
❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Core i5-14490F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-14490F.

Core i5-14490F

2024

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Core i5-14490F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (2,510 vs 16,000).
❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-14490F.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS better than Core i5-14490F?

Yes. Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 6.6% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data and 537.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.6% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the better fit. You are getting 537.5% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-14490F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $209 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-14490F is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (132.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-14490F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-14490F Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-14490F	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1080p
low	246 FPS	269 FPS
medium	231 FPS	243 FPS
high	196 FPS	204 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	215 FPS	236 FPS
medium	183 FPS	193 FPS
high	151 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	149 FPS	164 FPS
medium	127 FPS	136 FPS
high	98 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	92 FPS

Open Core i5-14490F Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-14490F	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1080p
low	645 FPS	513 FPS
medium	549 FPS	421 FPS
high	464 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	411 FPS	323 FPS
1440p
low	555 FPS	448 FPS
medium	493 FPS	388 FPS
high	418 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	352 FPS	285 FPS
4K
low	326 FPS	295 FPS
medium	293 FPS	267 FPS
high	279 FPS	253 FPS
ultra	238 FPS	217 FPS

Open Core i5-14490F Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-14490F	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1080p
low	691 FPS	683 FPS
medium	691 FPS	683 FPS
high	691 FPS	647 FPS
ultra	691 FPS	546 FPS
1440p
low	691 FPS	683 FPS
medium	691 FPS	637 FPS
high	691 FPS	541 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	464 FPS
4K
low	596 FPS	541 FPS
medium	502 FPS	473 FPS
high	447 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	376 FPS	355 FPS

Open Core i5-14490F Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-14490F	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
1080p
low	691 FPS	683 FPS
medium	691 FPS	683 FPS
high	691 FPS	683 FPS
ultra	691 FPS	683 FPS
1440p
low	691 FPS	683 FPS
medium	691 FPS	683 FPS
high	691 FPS	660 FPS
ultra	592 FPS	573 FPS
4K
low	661 FPS	572 FPS
medium	585 FPS	511 FPS
high	514 FPS	457 FPS
ultra	436 FPS	394 FPS

Open Core i5-14490F Open Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14490F and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Core i5-14490F

The Core i5-14490F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,621 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-14490F packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-14490F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i5-14490F versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-14490F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14490F scores 27,621 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-14490F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 2,510 vs 16,000 (145.8% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,600 vs 2,605, a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,000 vs 10,348 (14.8% advantage for the Core i5-14490F). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14490F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

Feature	Core i5-14490F	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5.2 GHz+4%
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	4 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+50%	16 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	8 MB+540%
Process	10 nm	4 nm-60%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark	27,621+1%	27,318
Cinebench R23 Multi	2,510	16,000+537%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,600	2,605
Geekbench 6 Multi	12,000+16%	10,348

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-14490F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i5-14490F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,Z690,B760,Z790 (Core i5-14490F) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).

Feature	Core i5-14490F	Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Socket	LGA1700	FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+200%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14490F) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Core i5-14490F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14490F targets Mid-Range. Direct competitor: Core i5-14490F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.