
Core i5-12600KF
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12600KF
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $264 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1462.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 8W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 125W, a 117W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Core i5-12600KF needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,318 vs 27,594).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
Core i5-12600KF
2021Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 125W, a 117W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Core i5-12600KF needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $264 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1462.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 8W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,318 vs 27,594).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS better than Core i5-12600KF?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12600KF | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 293 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12600KF | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 412 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 375 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 475 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 418 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 358 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12600KF | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 635 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 476 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12600KF | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 690 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 690 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 646 FPS | 683 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 601 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 528 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 542 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 390 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12600KF and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Core i5-12600KF
Core i5-12600KF
The Core i5-12600KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 9.5 MB. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,594 points. Launch price was $264.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12600KF packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-12600KF has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i5-12600KF versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 3.7 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-12600KF uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12600KF scores 27,594 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-12600KF. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-12600KF vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.
| Feature | Core i5-12600KF | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.2 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 9.5 MB+19% | 8 MB |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 27,594+1% | 27,318 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,605 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,348 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12600KF uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i5-12600KF versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — the Core i5-12600KF supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12600KF supports up to 128 of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i5-12600KF) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).
| Feature | Core i5-12600KF | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 64 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12600KF) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Core i5-12600KF requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-12600KF rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i5-12600KF | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












