
Core i5-12600K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12600K
2021Why buy it
- ✅+9.4% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,472 vs 2,605).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $289 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1462.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 8W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+5.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 125W, a 117W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,000 vs 17,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
Core i5-12600K
2021Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+9.4% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅+5.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 125W, a 117W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,472 vs 2,605).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $289 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1462.5% higher power demand at 125W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,000 vs 17,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS better than Core i5-12600K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 311 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 292 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 577 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 487 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 411 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 635 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 476 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 690 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 690 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 644 FPS | 683 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 599 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 526 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 542 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 444 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12600K and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Core i5-12600K
Core i5-12600K
The Core i5-12600K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,586 points. Launch price was $289.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12600K packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-12600K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i5-12600K versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 3.7 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i5-12600K uses the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12600K scores 27,586 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-12600K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,500 vs 16,000 (9% advantage for the Core i5-12600K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,472 vs 2,605, a 5.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,863 vs 10,348 (13.6% advantage for the Core i5-12600K). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-12600K vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.
| Feature | Core i5-12600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.2 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 8 MB+540% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 27,586 | 27,318 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,500+9% | 16,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,472 | 2,605+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,863+15% | 10,348 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12600K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the Core i5-12600K versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — the Core i5-12600K supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12600K supports up to 128 of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z690,B660 (Core i5-12600K) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).
| Feature | Core i5-12600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+95900% | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 64 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-12600K) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-12600K) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12600K targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-12600K rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i5-12600K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












