
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +39.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,670 vs 38,581).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +39.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,670 vs 38,581).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 734 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 627 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 1122 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 1062 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 936 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 845 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 775 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 498 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1082 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 973 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 854 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 766 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 853 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 751 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 659 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 623 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 493 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 4.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 62,323 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS's 22,781 — a 92.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 38,581 vs 14,670 (89.8% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,926 vs 1,903, a 42.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 19,643 vs 10,609 (59.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+16% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+27% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+700% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-17% | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 62,323+174% | 22,781 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,581+163% | 14,670 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,926+54% | 1,903 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,643+85% | 10,609 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) and FP7 (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+40% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | true | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












