
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.9% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,670 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.9% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,670 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS — a 9.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS's 22,781 — a 67.1% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 14,670 (71.5% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 1,903, a 39.7% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 10,609 (56.6% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+10% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+3% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+88% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 45,784+101% | 22,781 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000+111% | 14,670 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846+50% | 1,903 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980+79% | 10,609 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and FP7 (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












