Core i9-12900TE vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

Intel

Core i9-12900TE

16 Cores24 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-12900TE

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $494 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

2022

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Core i9-12900TE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900TE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (22,781 vs 22,887).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-12900TE better than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS?
Yes. Core i9-12900TE is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 8.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i9-12900TE is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-12900TE is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-12900TE is the smarter buy today. Core i9-12900TE is at an unclear MSRP at $494 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (46.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-12900TE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i9-12900TERyzen 9 PRO 6950HS
1080p
low254 FPS251 FPS
medium239 FPS234 FPS
high201 FPS197 FPS
ultra172 FPS169 FPS
1440p
low220 FPS220 FPS
medium187 FPS186 FPS
high153 FPS152 FPS
ultra135 FPS133 FPS
4K
low151 FPS154 FPS
medium128 FPS131 FPS
high100 FPS101 FPS
ultra87 FPS89 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i9-12900TERyzen 9 PRO 6950HS
1080p
low330 FPS441 FPS
medium281 FPS370 FPS
high235 FPS322 FPS
ultra211 FPS287 FPS
1440p
low273 FPS370 FPS
medium242 FPS323 FPS
high209 FPS288 FPS
ultra178 FPS247 FPS
4K
low169 FPS255 FPS
medium151 FPS229 FPS
high142 FPS215 FPS
ultra123 FPS186 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i9-12900TERyzen 9 PRO 6950HS
1080p
low572 FPS570 FPS
medium572 FPS564 FPS
high572 FPS485 FPS
ultra572 FPS388 FPS
1440p
low572 FPS570 FPS
medium572 FPS510 FPS
high572 FPS437 FPS
ultra572 FPS355 FPS
4K
low572 FPS432 FPS
medium495 FPS368 FPS
high440 FPS323 FPS
ultra370 FPS262 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i9-12900TERyzen 9 PRO 6950HS
1080p
low572 FPS570 FPS
medium572 FPS570 FPS
high572 FPS570 FPS
ultra572 FPS570 FPS
1440p
low572 FPS570 FPS
medium572 FPS570 FPS
high572 FPS570 FPS
ultra572 FPS513 FPS
4K
low572 FPS536 FPS
medium572 FPS489 FPS
high511 FPS438 FPS
ultra433 FPS379 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-12900TE and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

Intel

Core i9-12900TE

The Core i9-12900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,887 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,781 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i9-12900TE packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-12900TE has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-12900TE versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-12900TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900TE scores 22,887 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS's 22,781 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-12900TE. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900TE vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS.

FeatureCore i9-12900TERyzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Cores / Threads
16 / 24+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
4.9 GHz+2%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
3.3 GHz+200%
L3 Cache
30 MB (total)+88%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+150%
512K (per core)
Process
10 nm
6 nm-40%
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark
22,887
22,781
Cinebench R23 Multi
14,670
Geekbench 6 Single
1,903
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,609
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-12900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-12900TERyzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Socket
LGA1700
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-12900TE) / Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Core i9-12900TE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i9-12900TERyzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 680M
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Mobile