
Core i9-12900TE
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-12900TE
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $494 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Core i9-12900TE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900TE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,781 vs 22,887).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i9-12900TE
2022Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Core i9-12900TE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $494 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900TE across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,781 vs 22,887).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-12900TE better than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900TE | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 254 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900TE | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-12900TE | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 572 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 572 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-12900TE | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 572 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 433 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-12900TE and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

Core i9-12900TE
Core i9-12900TE
The Core i9-12900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,887 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900TE packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-12900TE has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-12900TE versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-12900TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900TE scores 22,887 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS's 22,781 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-12900TE. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900TE vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS.
| Feature | Core i9-12900TE | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz+200% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+88% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 6 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 22,887 | 22,781 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,670 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,903 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,609 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-12900TE | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-12900TE) / Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Core i9-12900TE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i9-12900TE | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











