
Core i9-11900KB
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-11900KB
2021Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,264 vs 14,670).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $539 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅+19.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i9-11900KB
2021Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅+19.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,264 vs 14,670).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $539 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS better than Core i9-11900KB?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-11900KB | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 250 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-11900KB | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 410 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 365 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 262 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-11900KB | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 567 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 346 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 369 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 325 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-11900KB | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 567 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 567 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 567 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 567 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 567 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 469 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 417 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-11900KB and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

Core i9-11900KB
Core i9-11900KB
The Core i9-11900KB is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Maio 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,693 points. Launch price was $539.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i9-11900KB and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i9-11900KB versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-11900KB uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900KB scores 22,693 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS's 22,781 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,264 vs 14,670 (17.9% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). Multi-core Geekbench: 10,645 vs 10,609 (0.3% advantage for the Core i9-11900KB). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900KB vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS.
| Feature | Core i9-11900KB | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | 6 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H (2021) | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 22,693 | 22,781 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,264 | 14,670+20% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,903 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,645 | 10,609 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-11900KB uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Core i9-11900KB versus DDR5-4800 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS — the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-11900KB supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i9-11900KB) and FP7 (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS).
| Feature | Core i9-11900KB | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-11900KB has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-11900KB supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-11900KB) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (Core i9-11900KB) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i9-11900KB | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











