
Core i5-14500T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-14500T
2024Why buy it
- ✅+34.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $232 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,903 vs 2,561).
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,781 vs 22,889).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i5-14500T
2024Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅+34.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $232 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,903 vs 2,561).
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,781 vs 22,889).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14500T better than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 209 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 312 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 224 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 458 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 412 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 311 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| medium | 572 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 555 FPS | 570 FPS |
| ultra | 483 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 513 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 410 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14500T and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

Core i5-14500T
Core i5-14500T
The Core i5-14500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,889 points. Launch price was $232.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14500T packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-14500T has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-14500T versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-14500T uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14500T scores 22,889 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS's 22,781 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-14500T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,561 vs 1,903, a 29.5% lead for the Core i5-14500T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-14500T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS.
| Feature | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 3.3 GHz+94% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 22,889 | 22,781 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 14,670 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,561+35% | 1,903 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,609 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14500T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i5-14500T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-14500T) and FP7 (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS).
| Feature | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-14500T) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-14500T) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14500T targets Low Power Desktop, Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i5-14500T rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Core i5-14500T | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | Yes |
| Target Use | Low Power Desktop | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











