
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
2022Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,781 vs 23,934).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
2024Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,781 vs 23,934).
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U better than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 413 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 274 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 598 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 598 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 533 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 452 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 518 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 598 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 595 FPS |
| ultra | 598 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 598 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 598 FPS | 591 FPS |
| ultra | 597 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 535 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H


Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,934 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H — a 4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores 23,934 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H's 23,781 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+4% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-33% | 6 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point (2024−2025) | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 23,934 | 23,781 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,450 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,400 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the FP7 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U) / not specified (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U rivals Core Ultra 7 164U.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











