
Core i7-13620H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13620H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (64EU), while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
2022Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13620H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,781 vs 23,804).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13620H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13620H
2023Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics (64EU), while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13620H across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,781 vs 23,804).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13620H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13620H better than Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13620H | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13620H | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 384 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 532 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13620H | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 595 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 595 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 587 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 507 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13620H | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 595 FPS | 595 FPS |
| ultra | 595 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 595 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 595 FPS | 591 FPS |
| ultra | 595 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 502 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13620H and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

Core i7-13620H
Core i7-13620H
The Core i7-13620H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 23,804 points. Launch price was $502.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13620H packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13620H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-13620H versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-13620H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13620H scores 23,804 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H's 23,781 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-13620H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13620H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H.
| Feature | Core i7-13620H | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 23,804 | 23,781 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,176 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,859 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,766 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13620H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13620H | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13620H) / not specified (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H). The Core i7-13620H includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (64EU)), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-13620H | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics (64EU) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











