
Core i5-14450HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-14450HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,557 vs 23,781).
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14450HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14450HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-14450HX
2024Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,557 vs 23,781).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14450HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14450HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H better than Core i5-14450HX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-14450HX | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-14450HX | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 441 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 393 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 186 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-14450HX | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 589 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-14450HX | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 589 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 589 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 589 FPS | 595 FPS |
| ultra | 589 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 589 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 589 FPS | 595 FPS |
| high | 588 FPS | 591 FPS |
| ultra | 512 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 531 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14450HX and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H

Core i5-14450HX
Core i5-14450HX
The Core i5-14450HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): + 20 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,557 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
The Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,781 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14450HX packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-14450HX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-14450HX versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-14450HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14450HX scores 23,557 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H's 23,781 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-14450HX vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H.
| Feature | Core i5-14450HX | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+25% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 4.9 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.3 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| PassMark | 23,557 | 23,781 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14450HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-14450HX | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14450HX) / not specified (Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H). The Core i5-14450HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14450HX targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i5-14450HX | Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











