
EPYC 74F3
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 74F3
2021Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,666 vs 61,578).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.4 vs 82.2 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ❌336.4% higher power demand at 240W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D moves to FL1 and DDR5.
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $164 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.2 vs 66.4 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 240W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 74F3, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 74F3
2021Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $164 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 23.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 82.2 vs 66.4 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 240W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,666 vs 61,578).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.4 vs 82.2 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ❌336.4% higher power demand at 240W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9955HX3D moves to FL1 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 74F3, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9955HX3D better than EPYC 74F3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 74F3 | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 74F3 | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 507 FPS | 698 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 311 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 74F3 | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 725 FPS | 851 FPS |
| medium | 619 FPS | 696 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 627 FPS |
| ultra | 504 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 680 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 400 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 74F3 | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 937 FPS | 1080 FPS |
| medium | 854 FPS | 976 FPS |
| high | 731 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 647 FPS | 768 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 744 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 651 FPS | 753 FPS |
| high | 554 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 479 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 537 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 482 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 74F3 and Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

EPYC 74F3
EPYC 74F3
The EPYC 74F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,666 points. Launch price was $2,900.


Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,578 points. Launch price was $700.
Processing Power
The EPYC 74F3 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 74F3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 74F3 versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 74F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 74F3 scores 60,666 against the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D's 61,578 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 74F3 vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D.
| Feature | EPYC 74F3 | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5.4 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+12% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) |
| PassMark | 60,666 | 61,578+2% |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 74F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 74F3 versus 5600 on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports 54.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 74F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 96 — 190.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 74F3) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 74F3) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) — the EPYC 74F3 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 74F3) and FL1 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D).
| Feature | EPYC 74F3 | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 5600+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096+4167% | 96 |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 74F3) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D). The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the EPYC 74F3 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 74F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen 9 9955HX3D rivals Core Ultra 9 185H.
| Feature | EPYC 74F3 | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 74F3 launched at $913 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D debuted at $749. On MSRP ($913 vs $749), the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is $164 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 74F3 delivers 66.4 pts/$ vs 82.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — making the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D the 21.2% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 74F3 | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $913 | $749-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.4 | 82.2+24% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












