
Core i9-13900KS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900KS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,543 vs 61,578).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900KS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌7.2% HIGHER MSRP$749 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
Core i9-13900KS
2023Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,543 vs 61,578).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900KS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌7.2% HIGHER MSRP$749 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9955HX3D better than Core i9-13900KS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 790 FPS | 698 FPS |
| medium | 688 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 550 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 597 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 400 FPS | 311 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 336 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 312 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 794 FPS | 851 FPS |
| medium | 660 FPS | 696 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 627 FPS |
| ultra | 493 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 711 FPS | 680 FPS |
| medium | 599 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 522 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 463 FPS | 401 FPS |
| high | 412 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1089 FPS | 1080 FPS |
| medium | 975 FPS | 976 FPS |
| high | 853 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 760 FPS | 768 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 899 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 791 FPS | 753 FPS |
| high | 690 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 607 FPS | 571 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 661 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 592 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 523 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900KS and Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Core i9-13900KS
Core i9-13900KS
The Core i9-13900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,543 points. Launch price was $699.


Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,578 points. Launch price was $700.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900KS packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900KS has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core i9-13900KS versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900KS (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i9-13900KS uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900KS scores 60,543 against the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D's 61,578 — a 1.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900KS vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.8 GHz+7% | 5.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+28% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) |
| PassMark | 60,543 | 61,578+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 40,998 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,123 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 21,421 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900KS uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900KS versus 5600 on the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-13900KS supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 96 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900KS) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) — the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i9-13900KS) and FL1 (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D).
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 5600+111900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+209715100% | 96 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i9-13900KS) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900KS) and AMD Radeon 610M (Ryzen 9 9955HX3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900KS rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; Ryzen 9 9955HX3D rivals Core Ultra 9 185H.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13900KS launched at $699 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D debuted at $749. On MSRP ($699 vs $749), the Core i9-13900KS is $50 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900KS delivers 86.6 pts/$ vs 82.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D — making the Core i9-13900KS the 5.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | Ryzen 9 9955HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-7% | $749 |
| Performance per Dollar | 86.6+5% | 82.2 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












