
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 9955HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $599 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 9955HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Ryzen 9 9955HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9900X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (19,563 vs 26,000).
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
2025Ryzen 9 9955HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $599 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 9955HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9900X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (19,563 vs 26,000).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9900X3D better than Ryzen 9 9955HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9900X3D | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 281 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 102 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9900X3D | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 824 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 670 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 410 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 662 FPS | 564 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 335 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 214 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9900X3D | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 890 FPS | 848 FPS |
| medium | 722 FPS | 678 FPS |
| high | 649 FPS | 600 FPS |
| ultra | 559 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 716 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 582 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 511 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 377 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 9900X3D | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1116 FPS | 1071 FPS |
| medium | 1001 FPS | 966 FPS |
| high | 878 FPS | 843 FPS |
| ultra | 792 FPS | 759 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 872 FPS | 840 FPS |
| medium | 766 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 673 FPS | 651 FPS |
| ultra | 584 FPS | 564 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 637 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 503 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 435 FPS | 420 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 9900X3D and Ryzen 9 9955HX


Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
The Ryzen 9 9900X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 56,301 points. Launch price was $599.


Ryzen 9 9955HX
Ryzen 9 9955HX
The Ryzen 9 9955HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,711 points. Launch price was $650.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 9900X3D packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 9955HX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9900X3D versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9955HX — a 1.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X3D (base: 4.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 9900X3D uses the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX uses Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 9900X3D scores 56,301 against the Ryzen 9 9955HX's 55,711 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,400 vs 3,219, a 5.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 9900X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 26,000 vs 19,563 (28.3% advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X3D). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9900X3D vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9955HX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X3D | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz+2% | 5.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.4 GHz+76% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) |
| PassMark | 56,301+1% | 55,711 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,010 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,400+6% | 3,219 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 26,000+33% | 19,563 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 9900X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 9900X3D supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 9900X3D) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 9955HX) — the Ryzen 9 9955HX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X670,X670E,X870,X870E (Ryzen 9 9900X3D) and AMD FL1 (Ryzen 9 9955HX).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X3D | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+100% | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 28+17% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9900X3D) vs true (Ryzen 9 9955HX). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) (Ryzen 9 9900X3D) and Radeon 610M (Ryzen 9 9955HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 9900X3D targets High End Gaming/Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 9900X3D rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Ryzen 9 9955HX rivals Core Ultra 9 275HX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 9900X3D | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | High End Gaming/Creation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












