
EPYC 7443P
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 9955HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7443P
2021Why buy it
- ✅+2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,337 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 9955HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌263.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9955HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9955HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 9955HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 200W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while EPYC 7443P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (55,711 vs 56,808).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7443P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7443P
2021Ryzen 9 9955HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+2% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 200W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 610M, while EPYC 7443P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9955HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,337 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 9955HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌263.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9955HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9955HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (55,711 vs 56,808).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7443P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9955HX better than EPYC 7443P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7443P | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 102 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7443P | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 442 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 564 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 307 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 214 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7443P | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 725 FPS | 848 FPS |
| medium | 619 FPS | 678 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 600 FPS |
| ultra | 504 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 543 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 400 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7443P | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 915 FPS | 1071 FPS |
| medium | 830 FPS | 966 FPS |
| high | 715 FPS | 843 FPS |
| ultra | 632 FPS | 759 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 726 FPS | 840 FPS |
| medium | 633 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 542 FPS | 651 FPS |
| ultra | 469 FPS | 564 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 420 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7443P and Ryzen 9 9955HX

EPYC 7443P
EPYC 7443P
The EPYC 7443P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.85 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 56,808 points. Launch price was $1,337.


Ryzen 9 9955HX
Ryzen 9 9955HX
The Ryzen 9 9955HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,711 points. Launch price was $650.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7443P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7443P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 7443P versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9955HX — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9955HX (base: 2.85 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 7443P uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX uses Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7443P scores 56,808 against the Ryzen 9 9955HX's 55,711 — a 1.9% lead for the EPYC 7443P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7443P vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9955HX.
| Feature | EPYC 7443P | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5.4 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 2.85 GHz+14% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm+ | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Milan (2021−2023) | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) |
| PassMark | 56,808+2% | 55,711 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,010 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,219 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,563 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7443P uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7443P versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 9955HX — the EPYC 7443P supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7443P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 96 GB — 190.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7443P) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 9955HX). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7443P) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 9955HX) — the EPYC 7443P offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7443P) and AMD FL1 (Ryzen 9 9955HX).
| Feature | EPYC 7443P | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 96 GB+2457500% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7443P) vs true (Ryzen 9 9955HX). The Ryzen 9 9955HX includes integrated graphics (Radeon 610M), while the EPYC 7443P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7443P rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Ryzen 9 9955HX rivals Core Ultra 9 275HX.
| Feature | EPYC 7443P | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












