Core Ultra 9 275HX vs Ryzen 9 9955HX

Intel

Core Ultra 9 275HX

24 Cores24 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 9955HX

16 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 9 275HX

2025

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (17,908 vs 19,563).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).

Ryzen 9 9955HX

2025

Why buy it

  • +9.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
  • +77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
  • 16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 275HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 9 275HX better than Ryzen 9 9955HX?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core Ultra 9 275HX is ahead with a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 9955HX pulls ahead with 9.2% better Geekbench multi-core. Ryzen 9 9955HX also has the bigger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 9955HX is the better fit. You are getting 9.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core Ultra 9 275HX still looks like the safer overall buy. Core Ultra 9 275HX is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 7.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 9 9955HX is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore Ultra 9 275HXRyzen 9 9955HX
1080p
low309 FPS284 FPS
medium299 FPS261 FPS
high246 FPS214 FPS
ultra208 FPS180 FPS
1440p
low269 FPS260 FPS
medium228 FPS217 FPS
high175 FPS167 FPS
ultra154 FPS147 FPS
4K
low179 FPS181 FPS
medium151 FPS151 FPS
high112 FPS115 FPS
ultra101 FPS102 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore Ultra 9 275HXRyzen 9 9955HX
1080p
low802 FPS666 FPS
medium700 FPS577 FPS
high565 FPS433 FPS
ultra495 FPS369 FPS
1440p
low682 FPS564 FPS
medium614 FPS503 FPS
high505 FPS389 FPS
ultra408 FPS305 FPS
4K
low382 FPS318 FPS
medium349 FPS288 FPS
high326 FPS253 FPS
ultra283 FPS214 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore Ultra 9 275HXRyzen 9 9955HX
1080p
low866 FPS848 FPS
medium708 FPS678 FPS
high628 FPS600 FPS
ultra537 FPS515 FPS
1440p
low744 FPS678 FPS
medium611 FPS542 FPS
high529 FPS469 FPS
ultra453 FPS397 FPS
4K
low527 FPS482 FPS
medium446 FPS399 FPS
high403 FPS359 FPS
ultra344 FPS301 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore Ultra 9 275HXRyzen 9 9955HX
1080p
low1078 FPS1071 FPS
medium959 FPS966 FPS
high841 FPS843 FPS
ultra757 FPS759 FPS
1440p
low862 FPS840 FPS
medium756 FPS746 FPS
high660 FPS651 FPS
ultra585 FPS564 FPS
4K
low635 FPS618 FPS
medium565 FPS553 FPS
high500 FPS487 FPS
ultra437 FPS420 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 275HX and Ryzen 9 9955HX

Intel

Core Ultra 9 275HX

The Core Ultra 9 275HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 56,018 points. Launch price was $600.

AMD

Ryzen 9 9955HX

The Ryzen 9 9955HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,711 points. Launch price was $650.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 9 275HX packs 24 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core Ultra 9 275HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 275HX versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9955HX — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 275HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX uses Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 275HX scores 56,018 against the Ryzen 9 9955HX's 55,711 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 275HX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,835 vs 3,219, a 12.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 9955HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,908 vs 19,563 (8.8% advantage for the Ryzen 9 9955HX). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 275HX vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9955HX.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 275HXRyzen 9 9955HX
Cores / Threads
24 / 24+50%
16 / 32
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz
5.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+8%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
36 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)+200%
1 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-25%
4 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-HX (2025)
Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025)
PassMark
56,018
55,711
Cinebench R23 Multi
38,010
Geekbench 6 Single
2,835
3,219+14%
Geekbench 6 Multi
17,908
19,563+9%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 9 275HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 9 275HX supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 9955HX) — the Ryzen 9 9955HX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) and AMD FL1 (Ryzen 9 9955HX).

FeatureCore Ultra 9 275HXRyzen 9 9955HX
Socket
FCBGA2114
FL1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB+167%
96 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
28+17%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 9 275HX) vs true (Ryzen 9 9955HX). Both include integrated graphics Intel Arc Graphics (Core Ultra 9 275HX) and Radeon 610M (Ryzen 9 9955HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 275HX targets High-End Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 275HX rivals Ryzen 9 9955HX; Ryzen 9 9955HX rivals Core Ultra 9 275HX.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 275HXRyzen 9 9955HX
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics
Radeon 610M
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
Target Use
High-End Gaming Laptop