
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 9955HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 9 275HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (17,908 vs 19,563).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 9955HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅+9.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 275HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Core Ultra 9 275HX
2025Ryzen 9 9955HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Why buy it
- ✅+9.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (17,908 vs 19,563).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 275HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 9 275HX better than Ryzen 9 9955HX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 102 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 802 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 700 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 565 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 495 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 682 FPS | 564 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 214 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 866 FPS | 848 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 678 FPS |
| high | 628 FPS | 600 FPS |
| ultra | 537 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 744 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 611 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 453 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 344 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1078 FPS | 1071 FPS |
| medium | 959 FPS | 966 FPS |
| high | 841 FPS | 843 FPS |
| ultra | 757 FPS | 759 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 862 FPS | 840 FPS |
| medium | 756 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 660 FPS | 651 FPS |
| ultra | 585 FPS | 564 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 420 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 275HX and Ryzen 9 9955HX

Core Ultra 9 275HX
Core Ultra 9 275HX
The Core Ultra 9 275HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 56,018 points. Launch price was $600.


Ryzen 9 9955HX
Ryzen 9 9955HX
The Ryzen 9 9955HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,711 points. Launch price was $650.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 275HX packs 24 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9955HX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core Ultra 9 275HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 275HX versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9955HX — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 275HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX uses Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 275HX scores 56,018 against the Ryzen 9 9955HX's 55,711 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 275HX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,835 vs 3,219, a 12.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 9955HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,908 vs 19,563 (8.8% advantage for the Ryzen 9 9955HX). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 275HX vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9955HX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 24+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+8% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) | Fire Range-HX (Zen 5) (2025) |
| PassMark | 56,018 | 55,711 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,010 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,835 | 3,219+14% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,908 | 19,563+9% |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 275HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 9955HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 9 275HX supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 90.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 9955HX) — the Ryzen 9 9955HX offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) and AMD FL1 (Ryzen 9 9955HX).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2114 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+167% | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 28+17% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 9955HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 9 275HX) vs true (Ryzen 9 9955HX). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc Graphics (Core Ultra 9 275HX) and Radeon 610M (Ryzen 9 9955HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 275HX targets High-End Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 275HX rivals Ryzen 9 9955HX; Ryzen 9 9955HX rivals Core Ultra 9 275HX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9955HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | High-End Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












