
EPYC 7573X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 7573X
2022Why buy it
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (69,432 vs 70,177).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 100.4 PassMark/$ ($5,590 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌64.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 170W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,891 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 708.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.4 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 280W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7573X, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7573X
2022Ryzen 9 9950X3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,891 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 708.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.4 vs 12.4 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $5,590 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 280W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (69,432 vs 70,177).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 100.4 PassMark/$ ($5,590 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌64.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 170W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 768 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7573X, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9950X3D better than EPYC 7573X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 7573X | Ryzen 9 9950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 106 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 7573X | Ryzen 9 9950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 722 FPS |
| medium | 407 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 381 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 524 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 218 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 224 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 7573X | Ryzen 9 9950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 865 FPS | 893 FPS |
| medium | 717 FPS | 725 FPS |
| high | 668 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 590 FPS | 560 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 622 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 472 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 345 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 387 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 322 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 7573X | Ryzen 9 9950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 992 FPS | 1116 FPS |
| medium | 900 FPS | 1001 FPS |
| high | 775 FPS | 878 FPS |
| ultra | 671 FPS | 792 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 767 FPS | 872 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 766 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 584 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 637 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 503 FPS |
| ultra | 372 FPS | 435 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7573X and Ryzen 9 9950X3D

EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7573X
The EPYC 7573X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-01. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 69,432 points. Launch price was $5,590.


Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
The Ryzen 9 9950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 70,177 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The EPYC 7573X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7573X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the EPYC 7573X versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9950X3D — a 45.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The EPYC 7573X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9950X3D uses Granite Ridge (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7573X scores 69,432 against the Ryzen 9 9950X3D's 70,177 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D. L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7573X vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9950X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 7573X | Ryzen 9 9950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 5.7 GHz+58% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.3 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 768 MB (total)+500% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Milan-X (2022) | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 69,432 | 70,177+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 44,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,398 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 22,206 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 7573X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 9950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the EPYC 7573X versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 9950X3D — the EPYC 7573X supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7573X supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7573X) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 9950X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7573X) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 9950X3D) — the EPYC 7573X offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7573X) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (Ryzen 9 9950X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 7573X | Ryzen 9 9950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP3 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 192 GB+4915100% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 9950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 9950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7573X) vs true (Ryzen 9 9950X3D). The Ryzen 9 9950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics (2 Cores)), while the EPYC 7573X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 7573X rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Ryzen 9 9950X3D rivals Core Ultra 9 285K.
| Feature | EPYC 7573X | Ryzen 9 9950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 7573X launched at $5590 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 9950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($5590 vs $699), the Ryzen 9 9950X3D is $4891 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7573X delivers 12.4 pts/$ vs 100.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 9950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 9950X3D the 156% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 7573X | Ryzen 9 9950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5590 | $699-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.4 | 100.4+710% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












