
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 9900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (31,000 vs 33,003).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 9900X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 125W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌22% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$409 MSRP
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen 9 9900X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $90 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 125W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (31,000 vs 33,003).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌22% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$409 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9900X better than Core i7-13700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 635 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 534 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 321 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 224 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 899 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 711 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 726 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 492 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 418 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 322 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 1126 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 989 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 862 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 891 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 774 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 677 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 644 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 569 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 433 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 9 9900X

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 9 9900X
Ryzen 9 9900X
The Ryzen 9 9900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,530 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9900X — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9900X uses Granite Ridge (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 9 9900X's 54,530 — a 17.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 9900X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 33,003 (6.3% advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 3,401, a 17.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 9900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 19,756 (4% advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.6 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+113% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 45,784 | 54,530+19% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | 33,003+6% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | 3,401+20% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | 19,756+4% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 9900X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 9900X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 9900X) — the Ryzen 9 9900X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and A620,B650,X670,X870 (Ryzen 9 9900X).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 9900X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9900X). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Radeon 610M (Ryzen 9 9900X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 9900X debuted at $499. On MSRP ($409 vs $499), the Core i7-13700K is $90 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 109.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 9900X — making the Core i7-13700K the 2.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-18% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+2% | 109.3 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












