
Core Ultra 9 275HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 9900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 9 275HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,835 vs 3,401).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (17,908 vs 19,756).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 9900X
2024Why buy it
- ✅+20% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Core Ultra 9 275HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Core Ultra 9 275HX
2025Ryzen 9 9900X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+20% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,835 vs 3,401).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (17,908 vs 19,756).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Core Ultra 9 275HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9900X better than Core Ultra 9 275HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 802 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 700 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 565 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 495 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 682 FPS | 635 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 534 FPS |
| high | 505 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 321 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 382 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 326 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 283 FPS | 224 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 866 FPS | 899 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 711 FPS |
| high | 628 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 537 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 744 FPS | 726 FPS |
| medium | 611 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 529 FPS | 492 FPS |
| ultra | 453 FPS | 418 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 344 FPS | 322 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1078 FPS | 1126 FPS |
| medium | 959 FPS | 989 FPS |
| high | 841 FPS | 862 FPS |
| ultra | 757 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 862 FPS | 891 FPS |
| medium | 756 FPS | 774 FPS |
| high | 660 FPS | 677 FPS |
| ultra | 585 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 644 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 569 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 433 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 275HX and Ryzen 9 9900X

Core Ultra 9 275HX
Core Ultra 9 275HX
The Core Ultra 9 275HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 56,018 points. Launch price was $600.


Ryzen 9 9900X
Ryzen 9 9900X
The Ryzen 9 9900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,530 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 275HX packs 24 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 9 275HX has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 275HX versus 5.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9900X — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X (base: 2.7 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 275HX uses the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9900X uses Granite Ridge (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 275HX scores 56,018 against the Ryzen 9 9900X's 54,530 — a 2.7% lead for the Core Ultra 9 275HX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,835 vs 3,401, a 18.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 9900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,908 vs 19,756 (9.8% advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 275HX vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9900X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 24+100% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.6 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 4.4 GHz+63% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-HX (2025) | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 56,018+3% | 54,530 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 33,003 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,835 | 3,401+20% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,908 | 19,756+10% |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 275HX uses the FCBGA2114 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 9900X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. Both support up to 256 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) and A620,B650,X670,X870 (Ryzen 9 9900X).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2114 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 9900X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 9 275HX) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9900X). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Arc Graphics (Core Ultra 9 275HX) and Radeon 610M (Ryzen 9 9900X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 275HX targets High-End Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 275HX rivals Ryzen 9 9955HX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 275HX | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | High-End Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












