PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,252 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Delivers 647.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 270W, a 150W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3375, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3375

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (17,713 vs 19,643).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($4,951 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌125% higher power demand at 270W vs 120W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Xeon W-3375

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +34.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,252 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Delivers 647.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 11.9 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $4,951 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 270W, a 150W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3375, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (17,713 vs 19,643).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.9 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($4,951 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌125% higher power demand at 270W vs 120W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Xeon W-3375?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3375 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 34.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 57 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better fit. You are getting 10.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 124.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 57 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $4,252 cheaper on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $4,951 MSRP, and it gives you a 34.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 647.0% better value on MSRP (89.2 vs 11.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 57 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 38/76. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3375 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon W-3375
1080p
low	291 FPS	191 FPS
medium	265 FPS	154 FPS
high	219 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	275 FPS	157 FPS
medium	227 FPS	123 FPS
high	177 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	190 FPS	72 FPS
medium	156 FPS	60 FPS
high	120 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	39 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon W-3375

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon W-3375
1080p
low	734 FPS	496 FPS
medium	627 FPS	431 FPS
high	465 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	393 FPS	286 FPS
1440p
low	602 FPS	425 FPS
medium	536 FPS	375 FPS
high	413 FPS	310 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	247 FPS
4K
low	338 FPS	264 FPS
medium	305 FPS	237 FPS
high	268 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	174 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon W-3375

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon W-3375
1080p
low	1025 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	1122 FPS	937 FPS
high	1062 FPS	880 FPS
ultra	875 FPS	796 FPS
1440p
low	936 FPS	799 FPS
medium	845 FPS	710 FPS
high	775 FPS	667 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	597 FPS
4K
low	574 FPS	514 FPS
medium	498 FPS	424 FPS
high	447 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	305 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon W-3375

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon W-3375
1080p
low	1082 FPS	932 FPS
medium	973 FPS	847 FPS
high	854 FPS	732 FPS
ultra	766 FPS	633 FPS
1440p
low	853 FPS	732 FPS
medium	751 FPS	644 FPS
high	659 FPS	554 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	480 FPS
4K
low	623 FPS	532 FPS
medium	555 FPS	476 FPS
high	493 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	426 FPS	360 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon W-3375

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Xeon W-3375

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon W-3375

The Xeon W-3375 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,091 points. Launch price was $4,499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-3375 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon W-3375 has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3375 — a 35.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon W-3375 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 62,323 against the Xeon W-3375's 59,091 — a 5.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,926 vs 1,818, a 46.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 19,643 vs 17,713 (10.3% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3375.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon W-3375
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	38 / 76+138%
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+43%	4 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+68%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+125%	57 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	62,323+5%	59,091
Cinebench R23 Multi	38,581	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,926+61%	1,818
Geekbench 6 Multi	19,643+11%	17,713

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3375 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon W-3375 — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3375 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 8 (Xeon W-3375). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 64 (Xeon W-3375) — the Xeon W-3375 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3375).

Feature	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon W-3375
Socket	AM5	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	64+129%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support true virtualization. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon W-3375 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K; Xeon W-3375 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon W-3375
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	true	true

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D launched at $699 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3375 debuted at $4951. On MSRP ($699 vs $4951), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $4252 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D delivers 89.2 pts/$ vs 11.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3375 — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 152.8% better value option.