PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +63.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 120W instead of 135W, a 15W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon E5-4667 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.2 vs 120.3 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).

Xeon E5-4667 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $571 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 34.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.3 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,397 vs 62,323).
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Xeon E5-4667 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +63.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 120W instead of 135W, a 15W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon E5-4667 v3 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Costs $571 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Delivers 34.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.3 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.2 vs 120.3 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,397 vs 62,323).
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Xeon E5-4667 v3?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-4667 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 63.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 40 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better fit. You are getting 304.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 220% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 40 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4667 v3 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 446.1% more expensive on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it gives you a 63.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-4667 v3 is also 34.9% better value on MSRP (120.3 vs 89.2 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2015), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 40 MB, more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-4667 v3 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-4667 v3
1080p
low	291 FPS	175 FPS
medium	265 FPS	151 FPS
high	219 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	275 FPS	147 FPS
medium	227 FPS	123 FPS
high	177 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	190 FPS	68 FPS
medium	156 FPS	61 FPS
high	120 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon E5-4667 v3

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-4667 v3
1080p
low	734 FPS	212 FPS
medium	627 FPS	193 FPS
high	465 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	393 FPS	132 FPS
1440p
low	602 FPS	183 FPS
medium	536 FPS	166 FPS
high	413 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	338 FPS	115 FPS
medium	305 FPS	106 FPS
high	268 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	74 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon E5-4667 v3

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-4667 v3
1080p
low	1025 FPS	385 FPS
medium	1122 FPS	385 FPS
high	1062 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	875 FPS	385 FPS
1440p
low	936 FPS	385 FPS
medium	845 FPS	385 FPS
high	775 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	385 FPS
4K
low	574 FPS	385 FPS
medium	498 FPS	359 FPS
high	447 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	270 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon E5-4667 v3

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-4667 v3
1080p
low	1082 FPS	385 FPS
medium	973 FPS	385 FPS
high	854 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	766 FPS	385 FPS
1440p
low	853 FPS	385 FPS
medium	751 FPS	385 FPS
high	659 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	385 FPS
4K
low	623 FPS	385 FPS
medium	555 FPS	385 FPS
high	493 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	426 FPS	358 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon E5-4667 v3

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Xeon E5-4667 v3

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon E5-4667 v3

The Xeon E5-4667 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,397 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Xeon E5-4667 v3 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — a 65.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 62,323 against the Xeon E5-4667 v3's 15,397 — a 120.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4667 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+97%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+110%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+220%	40 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256K (per core)
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-77%	22 nm
Architecture	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	62,323+305%	15,397
Cinebench R23 Multi	38,581	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,926	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	19,643	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Socket	AM5	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	28	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) / not specified (Xeon E5-4667 v3). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	Yes	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D launched at $699 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 debuted at $128. On MSRP ($699 vs $128), the Xeon E5-4667 v3 is $571 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D delivers 89.2 pts/$ vs 120.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — making the Xeon E5-4667 v3 the 29.7% better value option.