PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +43.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,416 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1384.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 145W, a 25W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2699 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅42.9% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,711 vs 62,323).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($4,115 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌20.8% higher power demand at 145W vs 120W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Xeon E5-2699 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +43.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,416 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1384.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $4,115 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 145W, a 25W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅42.9% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699 v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,711 vs 62,323).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($4,115 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌20.8% higher power demand at 145W vs 120W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Xeon E5-2699 v4?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2699 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 43.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 55 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better fit. You are getting 152.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 132.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 55 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $3,416 cheaper on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $4,115 MSRP, and it gives you a 43.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1384.7% better value on MSRP (89.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 55 MB, more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 22/44, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2699 v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-2699 v4
1080p
low	291 FPS	187 FPS
medium	265 FPS	164 FPS
high	219 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	275 FPS	154 FPS
medium	227 FPS	130 FPS
high	177 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	190 FPS	70 FPS
medium	156 FPS	62 FPS
high	120 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	39 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon E5-2699 v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-2699 v4
1080p
low	734 FPS	211 FPS
medium	627 FPS	192 FPS
high	465 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	393 FPS	132 FPS
1440p
low	602 FPS	182 FPS
medium	536 FPS	165 FPS
high	413 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	338 FPS	115 FPS
medium	305 FPS	105 FPS
high	268 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	74 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon E5-2699 v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-2699 v4
1080p
low	1025 FPS	618 FPS
medium	1122 FPS	618 FPS
high	1062 FPS	618 FPS
ultra	875 FPS	618 FPS
1440p
low	936 FPS	618 FPS
medium	845 FPS	618 FPS
high	775 FPS	590 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	532 FPS
4K
low	574 FPS	469 FPS
medium	498 FPS	382 FPS
high	447 FPS	347 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	289 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon E5-2699 v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-2699 v4
1080p
low	1082 FPS	618 FPS
medium	973 FPS	618 FPS
high	854 FPS	618 FPS
ultra	766 FPS	614 FPS
1440p
low	853 FPS	618 FPS
medium	751 FPS	618 FPS
high	659 FPS	572 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	484 FPS
4K
low	623 FPS	551 FPS
medium	555 FPS	493 FPS
high	493 FPS	436 FPS
ultra	426 FPS	373 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon E5-2699 v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Xeon E5-2699 v4

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon E5-2699 v4

The Xeon E5-2699 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB. L2 cache: 5.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,711 points. Launch price was $4,115.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2699 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699 v4 — a 45.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 62,323 against the Xeon E5-2699 v4's 24,711 — a 86.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs 55 MB on the Xeon E5-2699 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-2699 v4
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	22 / 44+38%
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+58%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+91%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+133%	55 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	5.5 MB+450%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	62,323+152%	24,711
Cinebench R23 Multi	38,581	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,926	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	19,643	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus 2400 on the Xeon E5-2699 v4 — the Xeon E5-2699 v4 supports 199.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2699 v4 supports up to 1536 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2699 v4). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2699 v4) — the Xeon E5-2699 v4 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) and C612 (Xeon E5-2699 v4).

Feature	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-2699 v4
Socket	AM5	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	2400+47900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+8738033%	1536
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	40+43%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2699 v4). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K; Xeon E5-2699 v4 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-2699 v4
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D launched at $699 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2699 v4 debuted at $4115. On MSRP ($699 vs $4115), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $3416 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D delivers 89.2 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2699 v4 — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 174.8% better value option.