PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +87.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,442 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
✅Delivers 982.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2687W v4, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2687W v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅42.9% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (8,255 vs 19,643).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($2,141 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Xeon E5-2687W v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +87.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,442 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
✅Delivers 982.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $2,141 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅42.9% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2687W v4, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (8,255 vs 19,643).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($2,141 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Xeon E5-2687W v4?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2687W v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 87.3% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 30 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better fit. You are getting 138% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 326.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $1,442 cheaper on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $2,141 MSRP, and it gives you a 87.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 982.2% better value on MSRP (89.2 vs 8.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 30 MB, more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 12/24, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2687W v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-2687W v4
1080p
low	291 FPS	163 FPS
medium	265 FPS	141 FPS
high	219 FPS	114 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	275 FPS	137 FPS
medium	227 FPS	116 FPS
high	177 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	190 FPS	63 FPS
medium	156 FPS	57 FPS
high	120 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	35 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon E5-2687W v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-2687W v4
1080p
low	734 FPS	326 FPS
medium	627 FPS	295 FPS
high	465 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	393 FPS	210 FPS
1440p
low	602 FPS	282 FPS
medium	536 FPS	258 FPS
high	413 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	326 FPS	183 FPS
4K
low	338 FPS	183 FPS
medium	305 FPS	167 FPS
high	268 FPS	145 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	115 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon E5-2687W v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-2687W v4
1080p
low	1025 FPS	441 FPS
medium	1122 FPS	441 FPS
high	1062 FPS	441 FPS
ultra	875 FPS	441 FPS
1440p
low	936 FPS	441 FPS
medium	845 FPS	441 FPS
high	775 FPS	441 FPS
ultra	656 FPS	441 FPS
4K
low	574 FPS	441 FPS
medium	498 FPS	375 FPS
high	447 FPS	341 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	284 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon E5-2687W v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-2687W v4
1080p
low	1082 FPS	441 FPS
medium	973 FPS	441 FPS
high	854 FPS	441 FPS
ultra	766 FPS	441 FPS
1440p
low	853 FPS	441 FPS
medium	751 FPS	441 FPS
high	659 FPS	441 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	441 FPS
4K
low	623 FPS	441 FPS
medium	555 FPS	441 FPS
high	493 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	426 FPS	348 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D Open Xeon E5-2687W v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Xeon E5-2687W v4

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon E5-2687W v4

The Xeon E5-2687W v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 17,640 points. Launch price was $2,141.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W v4 — a 47.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 4.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 62,323 against the Xeon E5-2687W v4's 17,640 — a 111.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,926 vs 1,063, a 93.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 19,643 vs 8,255 (81.6% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs 30 MB on the Xeon E5-2687W v4.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-2687W v4
Cores / Threads	16 / 32+33%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+63%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	4.2 GHz+40%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+327%	30 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	3 MB+200%
Process	5 nm, 6 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	62,323+253%	17,640
Cinebench R23 Multi	38,581	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,926+175%	1,063
Geekbench 6 Multi	19,643+138%	8,255

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon E5-2687W v4 — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2687W v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2687W v4). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2687W v4) — the Xeon E5-2687W v4 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) and C610,X99 (Xeon E5-2687W v4).

Feature	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-2687W v4
Socket	AM5	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+25%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1536 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	40+43%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs Yes (Xeon E5-2687W v4). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.

Feature	Ryzen 9 7950X3D	Xeon E5-2687W v4
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon Graphics	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	true	Yes

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D launched at $699 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2687W v4 debuted at $2141. On MSRP ($699 vs $2141), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $1442 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D delivers 89.2 pts/$ vs 8.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2687W v4 — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 166.2% better value option.