
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2795NT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +79.3% higher average FPS across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon D-2795NT needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2795NT, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Xeon D-2795NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-2795NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,000 vs 38,581).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Xeon D-2795NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +79.3% higher average FPS across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon D-2795NT needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅14.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2795NT, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Xeon D-2795NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,000 vs 38,581).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Xeon D-2795NT?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 734 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 627 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 78 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 1122 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 1062 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 936 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 845 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 775 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 363 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 498 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 230 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1082 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 973 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 854 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 766 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 853 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 751 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 659 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 623 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 493 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 309 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Xeon D-2795NT


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.

Xeon D-2795NT
Xeon D-2795NT
The Xeon D-2795NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,463 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon D-2795NT offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon D-2795NT has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2795NT — a 59.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is built on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 62,323 against the Xeon D-2795NT's 28,463 — a 74.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 38,581 vs 15,000 (88% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,926 vs 1,962, a 39.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 19,643 vs 11,898 (49.1% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs 30 MB on the Xeon D-2795NT.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 20 / 40+25% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+84% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+110% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+327% | 30 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | — |
| PassMark | 62,323+119% | 28,463 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,581+157% | 15,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,926+49% | 1,962 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,643+65% | 11,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon D-2795NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-2795NT — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon D-2795NT supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 4 (Xeon D-2795NT). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 32 (Xeon D-2795NT) — the Xeon D-2795NT offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) and SoC platform (Xeon D-2795NT).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 32+14% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon D-2795NT). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon D-2795NT requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon D-2795NT targets Networking / Edge Computing / SoC. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K; Xeon D-2795NT rivals EPYC 7302.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Networking / Edge Computing / SoC |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












