
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $9,300 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- β Delivers 523.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- β Draws 120W instead of 350W, a 230W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (38,581 vs 148,000).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 384 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
2023Why buy it
- β +283.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- β +200% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 128 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- β 357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- β191.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 120W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $9,300 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- β Delivers 523.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 14.3 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
- β Draws 120W instead of 350W, a 230W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- β +283.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- β +200% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 128 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- β 357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (38,581 vs 148,000).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 384 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 14.3 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($9,999 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- β191.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 120W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 109 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 734 FPS | 780 FPS |
| medium | 627 FPS | 676 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 260 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 795 FPS |
| medium | 1122 FPS | 667 FPS |
| high | 1062 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 936 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 845 FPS | 593 FPS |
| high | 775 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 498 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1082 FPS | 1120 FPS |
| medium | 973 FPS | 997 FPS |
| high | 854 FPS | 874 FPS |
| ultra | 766 FPS | 771 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 853 FPS | 923 FPS |
| medium | 751 FPS | 801 FPS |
| high | 659 FPS | 706 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 614 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 623 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 493 FPS | 537 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 143,017 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX offers 96 cores / 192 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX has 80 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX β a 11.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 62,323 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX's 143,017 β a 78.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 38,581 vs 148,000 (117.3% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,926 vs 2,100, a 32.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 19,643 vs 81,000 (121.9% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs 384 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 96 / 192+500% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+12% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+68% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 384 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 62,323 | 143,017+129% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,581 | 148,000+284% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,926+39% | 2,100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,643 | 81,000+312% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support true virtualization. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX targets Workstation / Scientific Computing. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | β | Workstation / Scientific Computing |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D launched at $699 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX debuted at $9999. On MSRP ($699 vs $9999), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $9300 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D delivers 89.2 pts/$ vs 14.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX β making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 144.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-93% | $9999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.2+524% | 14.3 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












