
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- β +95.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- β Costs $5,800 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- β Delivers 511.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- β Draws 120W instead of 280W, a 160W reduction.
- β Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (38,581 vs 66,403).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
2022Why buy it
- β +72.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- β 357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,500 vs 2,926).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($6,499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- β133.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 120W.
- βOlder platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
2022Why buy it
- β +95.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- β Costs $5,800 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- β Delivers 511.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 14.6 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $6,499 MSRP).
- β Draws 120W instead of 280W, a 160W reduction.
- β Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- β +72.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- β 357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower Cinebench R23 multi-core (38,581 vs 66,403).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,500 vs 2,926).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 14.6 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($6,499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- β133.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 120W.
- βOlder platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 49 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 734 FPS | 760 FPS |
| medium | 627 FPS | 648 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 362 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 253 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 920 FPS |
| medium | 1122 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 1062 FPS | 712 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 936 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 845 FPS | 560 FPS |
| high | 775 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 498 FPS | 382 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 279 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1082 FPS | 1160 FPS |
| medium | 973 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 854 FPS | 894 FPS |
| ultra | 766 FPS | 790 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 853 FPS | 933 FPS |
| medium | 751 FPS | 809 FPS |
| high | 659 FPS | 709 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 613 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 623 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 493 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 94,737 points. Launch price was $6,499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX β a 23.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 62,323 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX's 94,737 β a 41.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 38,581 vs 66,403 (53% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,926 vs 1,500, a 64.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 19,643 vs 20,000 (1.8% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 64 / 128+300% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+27% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+56% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 256 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 62,323 | 94,737+52% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,581 | 66,403+72% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,926+95% | 1,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,643 | 20,000+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX β the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support true virtualization. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | true | true |
| Target Use | β | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D launched at $699 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX debuted at $6499. On MSRP ($699 vs $6499), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $5800 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D delivers 89.2 pts/$ vs 14.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX β making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 143.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-89% | $6499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.2+511% | 14.6 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












