
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +47.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 28W.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 120W, a 92W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (22,246 vs 38,581).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +47.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 120W, a 92W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (22,246 vs 38,581).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Ryzen AI 9 HX 375?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 291 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 734 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 627 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 326 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 115 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 738 FPS |
| medium | 1122 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 1062 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 875 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 936 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 845 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 775 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 498 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1082 FPS | 865 FPS |
| medium | 973 FPS | 809 FPS |
| high | 854 FPS | 694 FPS |
| ultra | 766 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 853 FPS | 757 FPS |
| medium | 751 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 659 FPS | 583 FPS |
| ultra | 569 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 623 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 493 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 426 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7950X3D and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.


Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,585 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 4.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 62,323 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375's 34,585 — a 57.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 38,581 vs 22,246 (53.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,926 vs 2,865, a 2.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 19,643 vs 15,100 (26.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+12% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+110% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+700% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| PassMark | 62,323+80% | 34,585 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 38,581+73% | 22,246 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,926+2% | 2,865 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,643+30% | 15,100 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) and SoC (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+75% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) and Radeon 890M (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 targets AI-Notebook. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K; Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | — | AI-Notebook |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D launched at $699 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($699 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is $699 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7950X3D | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.2 | — |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












