
Ryzen 7 6800HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,652 vs 62,323).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +49.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen 7 6800HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 6800HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +49.7% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Ryzen 7 6800HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,652 vs 62,323).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 6800HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Ryzen 7 6800HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 6800HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 6800HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 281 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 254 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 6800HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 6800HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 566 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 566 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 566 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 513 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 438 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 6800HS and Ryzen 9 7950X3D


Ryzen 7 6800HS
Ryzen 7 6800HS
The Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,652 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 6800HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 6800HS versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 3.2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 6800HS uses the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture (6 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 22,652 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 93.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 6800HS vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 6800HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 5.7 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+700% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 6 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-17% |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 22,652 | 62,323+175% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 6800HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 6800HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 6800HS) / true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen 7 6800HS requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 6800HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











