
Ryzen 5 8645HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 5 8645HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,316 vs 38,581).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8645HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Ryzen 5 8645HS
2023Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,316 vs 38,581).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 8645HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Ryzen 5 8645HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 156 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 369 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 218 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 556 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 556 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 556 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 556 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 556 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 520 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 445 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 556 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 556 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 556 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 556 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 556 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 556 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 545 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 556 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 506 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 450 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 5 8645HS and Ryzen 9 7950X3D


Ryzen 5 8645HS
Ryzen 5 8645HS
The Ryzen 5 8645HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,257 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 8645HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8645HS versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 13.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 4.3 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen 5 8645HS uses the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 8645HS scores 22,257 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 94.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,316 vs 38,581 (97.4% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,574 vs 2,926, a 12.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,675 vs 19,643 (59.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8645HS vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.7 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+2% | 4.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+700% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 22,257 | 62,323+180% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,316 | 38,581+190% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,574 | 2,926+14% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,675 | 19,643+84% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 8645HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5x-7500 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 8645HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 5 8645HS) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Ryzen 5 8645HS) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-7500 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 5 8645HS) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 760M (Ryzen 5 8645HS) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 8645HS targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 8645HS rivals Core i5-13500H; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 8645HS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 760M | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V (SVM) | true |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











