
M2 Pro
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M2 Pro
2023Why buy it
- β Draws 36W instead of 120W, a 84W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (14,450 vs 19,643).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +59.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while M2 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β233.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 36W.
M2 Pro
2023Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- β Draws 36W instead of 120W, a 84W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +59.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (14,450 vs 19,643).
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while M2 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β233.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 36W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than M2 Pro?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M2 Pro | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M2 Pro | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 380 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 269 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 216 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M2 Pro | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 545 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 478 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 420 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M2 Pro | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 548 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 548 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 548 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 548 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 525 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 451 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M2 Pro and Ryzen 9 7950X3D
M2 Pro
M2 Pro
The M2 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.42 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MBΒ +Β 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,939 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The M2 Pro packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads β the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the M2 Pro versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D β a 47.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.42 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is built on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Pro scores 21,939 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 β a 95.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 2,650 vs 2,926, a 9.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,450 vs 19,643 (30.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 24 MB on the M2 Pro vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | M2 Pro | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 12 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 5.7 GHz+63% |
| Base Clock | 2.42 GHz | 4.2 GHz+74% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 128 MB (total)+433% |
| L2 Cache | 36 MB+3500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | β | Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) |
| PassMark | 21,939 | 62,323+184% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,650 | 2,926+10% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,450 | 19,643+36% |
Memory & Platform
The M2 Pro uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB β 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (M2 Pro) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) β the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple Silicon (M2 Pro) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | M2 Pro | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: ARM Virtualization (M2 Pro) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics β Apple M2 Pro GPU (M2 Pro) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Pro targets Professional Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | M2 Pro | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Apple M2 Pro GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | ARM Virtualization | true |
| Target Use | Professional Laptop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












