
M1 Pro
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M1 Pro
2021Why buy it
- β Draws 28W instead of 120W, a 92W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (17,218 vs 62,323).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +70.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while M1 Pro needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while M1 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β328.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 28W.
M1 Pro
2021Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- β Draws 28W instead of 120W, a 92W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +70.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while M1 Pro needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (17,218 vs 62,323).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while M1 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β328.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 28W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than M1 Pro?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M1 Pro | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 55 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M1 Pro | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M1 Pro | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 359 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 320 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 217 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M1 Pro | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 363 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M1 Pro and Ryzen 9 7950X3D
M1 Pro
M1 Pro
The M1 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.064 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MBΒ +Β 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,218 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The M1 Pro packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads β the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.22 GHz on the M1 Pro versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D β a 55.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.064 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is built on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. In PassMark, the M1 Pro scores 17,218 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 β a 113.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 24 MB on the M1 Pro vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | M1 Pro | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10 | 16 / 32+60% |
| Boost Clock | 3.22 GHz | 5.7 GHz+77% |
| Base Clock | 2.064 GHz | 4.2 GHz+103% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB | 128 MB (total)+433% |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB+2700% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | β | Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) |
| PassMark | 17,218 | 62,323+262% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The M1 Pro uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | M1 Pro | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (M1 Pro) / true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the M1 Pro requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | M1 Pro | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | Yes |
| IGPU Model | β | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | β | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











