
M1 Max
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
M1 Max
2021Why buy it
- β Draws 28W instead of 120W, a 92W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (22,146 vs 62,323).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +57.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while M1 Max mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β328.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 28W.
M1 Max
2021Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- β Draws 28W instead of 120W, a 92W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +57.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (22,146 vs 62,323).
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while M1 Max mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β328.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 28W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than M1 Max?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | M1 Max | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | M1 Max | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | M1 Max | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 554 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 473 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 415 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | M1 Max | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 554 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 554 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 532 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 453 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 451 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of M1 Max and Ryzen 9 7950X3D
M1 Max
M1 Max
The M1 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.06 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MBΒ +Β 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,146 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The M1 Max packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads β the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.22 GHz on the M1 Max versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D β a 55.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.06 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is built on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) architecture. In PassMark, the M1 Max scores 22,146 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 β a 95.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 48 MB on the M1 Max vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | M1 Max | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10 | 16 / 32+60% |
| Boost Clock | 3.22 GHz | 5.7 GHz+77% |
| Base Clock | 2.06 GHz | 4.2 GHz+104% |
| L3 Cache | 48 MB | 128 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 28 MB+2700% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | β | Raphael (Zen4) (2022β2023) |
| PassMark | 22,146 | 62,323+181% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The M1 Max uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5-6400 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB β 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (M1 Max) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). PCIe lanes: 0 (M1 Max) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) β the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | M1 Max | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-6400 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: ARM-V (M1 Max) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics β M1 Max GPU (M1 Max) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M1 Max targets Mobile Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | M1 Max | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | M1 Max GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | ARM-V | true |
| Target Use | Mobile Workstation | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











