
EPYC 9454
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9454
2022Why buy it
- ✅+41.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.8 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($5,225 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌141.7% higher power demand at 290W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +50.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,526 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 429.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 290W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 9454 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,323 vs 87,961).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9454, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 9454
2022Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+41.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +50.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,526 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 429.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $5,225 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 290W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 9454 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.8 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($5,225 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌141.7% higher power demand at 290W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,323 vs 87,961).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9454, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than EPYC 9454?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 438 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 426 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 377 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 902 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 822 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 708 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 625 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 724 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 631 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 464 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9454 and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

EPYC 9454
EPYC 9454
The EPYC 9454 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.75 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 87,961 points. Launch price was $5,225.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9454 packs 48 cores / 96 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 9454 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 9454 versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 40% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.75 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 9454 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9454 scores 87,961 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 34.1% lead for the EPYC 9454. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9454 vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 48 / 96+200% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 5.7 GHz+50% |
| Base Clock | 2.75 GHz | 4.2 GHz+53% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 87,961+41% | 62,323 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9454 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9454) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9454) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the EPYC 9454 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9454) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+4700% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9454) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 9454 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9454 targets Data Center. Direct competitor: EPYC 9454 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center | — |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9454 launched at $5225 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($5225 vs $699), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $4526 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9454 delivers 16.8 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 136.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9454 | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5225 | $699-87% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.8 | 89.2+431% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












