
EPYC 9275F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9275F
2024Why buy it
- ✅+35.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($3,439 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 320W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,740 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $3,439 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 262.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $3,439 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 320W, a 200W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 9275F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,323 vs 84,620).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9275F, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 9275F
2024Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅+35.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,740 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $3,439 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 262.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $3,439 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 320W, a 200W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 9275F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.6 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($3,439 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 320W vs 120W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,323 vs 84,620).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 9275F, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than EPYC 9275F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 725 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 618 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 421 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 338 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 300 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 270 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 239 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 923 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 748 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 675 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 572 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 724 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 584 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 433 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1141 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 902 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 813 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 891 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 785 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 689 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 600 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 650 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 515 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9275F and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

EPYC 9275F
EPYC 9275F
The EPYC 9275F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,620 points. Launch price was $3,439.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9275F packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 9275F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9275F versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 4.1 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 9275F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9275F scores 84,620 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 30.3% lead for the EPYC 9275F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9275F vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.7 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz+2% |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+100% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 84,620+36% | 62,323 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9275F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9275F versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — the EPYC 9275F supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9275F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9275F) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9275F) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the EPYC 9275F offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9275F) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6000+119900% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 128 GB+2184433% |
| RAM Channels | 12+500% | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+357% | 28 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9275F) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 9275F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 9275F rivals Xeon 6980P; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | true |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9275F launched at $3439 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($3439 vs $699), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $2740 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9275F delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 113.5% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3439 | $699-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.6 | 89.2+263% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












