PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 7773X

2022

Why buy it

✅+129.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($8,800 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌133.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 120W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $8,101 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
✅Delivers 759.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 280W, a 160W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (19,643 vs 45,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 768 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7773X, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7773X

2022

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅+129.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $8,101 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
✅Delivers 759.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $8,800 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 280W, a 160W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($8,800 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌133.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 120W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (19,643 vs 45,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 768 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7773X, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than EPYC 7773X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7773X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7773X is the better fit. You are getting 129.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (768 MB vs 128 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $8,101 cheaper on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $8,800 MSRP, and it gives you a 32.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that EPYC 7773X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 129.1% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 759.0% better value on MSRP (89.2 vs 10.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 7773X Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 7950X3D Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 7773X	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	197 FPS	291 FPS
medium	160 FPS	265 FPS
high	129 FPS	219 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	158 FPS	275 FPS
medium	124 FPS	227 FPS
high	96 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	156 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	190 FPS
medium	61 FPS	156 FPS
high	47 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	107 FPS

Open EPYC 7773X Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 7773X	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	257 FPS	734 FPS
medium	228 FPS	627 FPS
high	189 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	150 FPS	393 FPS
1440p
low	211 FPS	602 FPS
medium	192 FPS	536 FPS
high	164 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	126 FPS	326 FPS
4K
low	131 FPS	338 FPS
medium	121 FPS	305 FPS
high	106 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	229 FPS

Open EPYC 7773X Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 7773X	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	850 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	708 FPS	1122 FPS
high	660 FPS	1062 FPS
ultra	582 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	612 FPS	936 FPS
medium	508 FPS	845 FPS
high	466 FPS	775 FPS
ultra	407 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	437 FPS	574 FPS
medium	341 FPS	498 FPS
high	305 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	378 FPS

Open EPYC 7773X Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 7773X	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	955 FPS	1082 FPS
medium	867 FPS	973 FPS
high	742 FPS	854 FPS
ultra	639 FPS	766 FPS
1440p
low	738 FPS	853 FPS
medium	642 FPS	751 FPS
high	547 FPS	659 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	569 FPS
4K
low	525 FPS	623 FPS
medium	468 FPS	555 FPS
high	409 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	356 FPS	426 FPS

Open EPYC 7773X Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 7773X and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

EPYC 7773X

The EPYC 7773X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-22. It is based on the Milan-X (2022) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 768 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 91,340 points. Launch price was $8,800.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 7773X packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7773X has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7773X versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 47.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The EPYC 7773X uses the Milan-X (2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 7773X scores 91,340 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 37.8% lead for the EPYC 7773X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,536 vs 2,926, a 62.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 45,000 vs 19,643 (78.5% advantage for the EPYC 7773X). L3 cache: 768 MB (total) on the EPYC 7773X vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

Feature	EPYC 7773X	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Cores / Threads	64 / 128+300%	16 / 32
Boost Clock	3.5 GHz	5.7 GHz+63%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	4.2 GHz+91%
L3 Cache	768 MB (total)+500%	128 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm	5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Architecture	Milan-X (2022)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	91,340+47%	62,323
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	38,581
Geekbench 6 Single	1,536	2,926+90%
Geekbench 6 Multi	45,000+129%	19,643

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 7773X uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7773X versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 7773X) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 7773X) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the EPYC 7773X offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 7773X) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).

Feature	EPYC 7773X	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Socket	SP3	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-5200+25%
Max RAM Capacity	4 TB+3100%	128 GB
RAM Channels	8+300%	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+357%	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (EPYC 7773X) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 7773X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7773X targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7773X rivals EPYC 9654; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.

Feature	EPYC 7773X	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	None	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	true
Target Use	Server	—

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 7773X launched at $8800 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($8800 vs $699), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $8101 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 7773X delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 158.3% better value option.