
Core Ultra 7 258V
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 120W, a 103W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (10,000 vs 38,581).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.1 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +75.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 111.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 42.1 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅250% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌55.3% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌605.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 17W.
Core Ultra 7 258V
2024Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 120W, a 103W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +75.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 111.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 42.1 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅250% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (10,000 vs 38,581).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.1 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($450 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌55.3% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌605.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 17W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core Ultra 7 258V?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 258V | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 258V | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 258V | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 468 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 462 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 7 258V | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 474 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 258V and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V
The Core Ultra 7 258V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,947 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 258V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 258V versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 258V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 258V scores 18,947 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 106.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 10,000 vs 38,581 (117.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,750 vs 2,926, a 6.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,000 vs 19,643 (56.4% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 258V vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 258V | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.7 GHz+19% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+91% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+967% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core)+150% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 18,947 | 62,323+229% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 10,000 | 38,581+286% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,750 | 2,926+6% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,000 | 19,643+79% |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 258V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5X-8533 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Core Ultra 7 258V) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Lunar Lake (Core Ultra 7 258V) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 258V | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5X-8533 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 28+250% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 258V) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Arc 140V (Core Ultra 7 258V) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 258V targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 258V rivals Ryzen 7 8840U; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 258V | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Arc 140V | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 258V launched at $450 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($450 vs $699), the Core Ultra 7 258V is $249 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 258V delivers 42.1 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 71.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 258V | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450-36% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.1 | 89.2+112% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











