
Core Ultra 5 228V
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 228V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $404 less on MSRP ($295 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 120W, a 103W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,932 vs 38,581).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.5 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($295 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +65.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 55.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
- ✅250% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌136.9% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$295 MSRP
- ❌605.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 17W.
Core Ultra 5 228V
2024Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $404 less on MSRP ($295 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 17W instead of 120W, a 103W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +65.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 55.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 57.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $295 MSRP).
- ✅250% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,932 vs 38,581).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.5 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($295 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌136.9% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$295 MSRP
- ❌605.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 17W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core Ultra 5 228V?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 228V | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 148 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 228V | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 228V | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 384 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 228V | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 424 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 424 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 424 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 228V and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core Ultra 5 228V
Core Ultra 5 228V
The Core Ultra 5 228V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,955 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 228V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 228V versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.1 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 228V scores 16,955 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 114.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,932 vs 38,581 (118.1% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,585 vs 2,926, a 12.4% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,053 vs 19,643 (64.6% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 228V vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 228V | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 5.7 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core)+150% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Lunar Lake (2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 16,955 | 62,323+268% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 9,932 | 38,581+288% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,585 | 2,926+13% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,053 | 19,643+95% |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 228V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5X-8533 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Core Ultra 5 228V) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core Ultra 5 228V) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 228V | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2833 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5X-8533 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 28+250% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Core Ultra 5 228V) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Arc 130V (Core Ultra 5 228V) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 228V | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Arc 130V | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | Yes | true |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 5 228V launched at $295 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($295 vs $699), the Core Ultra 5 228V is $404 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 228V delivers 57.5 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 43.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 228V | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $295-58% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 57.5 | 89.2+55% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











