
Core i9-14900T
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-14900T
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,168 vs 62,323).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 69.5 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.4% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 28.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 69.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌27.3% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Core i9-14900T
2024Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.4% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 28.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 69.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,168 vs 62,323).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 69.5 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌27.3% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core i9-14900T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-14900T | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-14900T | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 421 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 379 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-14900T | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 759 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 623 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 464 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 676 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 563 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 420 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 494 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 327 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-14900T | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 954 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 877 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 767 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 682 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 815 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 716 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 550 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 602 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 538 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-14900T and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core i9-14900T
Core i9-14900T
The Core i9-14900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,168 points. Launch price was $549.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14900T packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-14900T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-14900T versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 1.1 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i9-14900T uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900T scores 38,168 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 48.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900T vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core i9-14900T | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz | 5.7 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz+282% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 38,168 | 62,323+63% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-14900T versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — the Core i9-14900T supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-14900T supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900T) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i9-14900T) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Core i9-14900T | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+111900% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 128 GB+69904967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-14900T) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-14900T) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900T rivals Ryzen 9 7900; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i9-14900T | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-14900T launched at $549 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($549 vs $699), the Core i9-14900T is $150 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900T delivers 69.5 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 24.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14900T | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-21% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 69.5 | 89.2+28% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












