
Core i9-14900HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-14900HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($668 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (35,000 vs 38,581).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.9 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 33.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 66.9 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌4.6% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$668 MSRP
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-14900HX.
Core i9-14900HX
2024Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($668 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 33.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 66.9 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (35,000 vs 38,581).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 66.9 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌4.6% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$668 MSRP
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-14900HX.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core i9-14900HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 436 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 355 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 317 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 258 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 761 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 542 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 466 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 681 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 501 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1001 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 896 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 783 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 696 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 831 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 731 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 639 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-14900HX and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core i9-14900HX
Core i9-14900HX
The Core i9-14900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 44,685 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14900HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-14900HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-14900HX versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i9-14900HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14900HX scores 44,685 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 33% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 35,000 vs 38,581 (9.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,000 vs 2,926, a 2.5% lead for the Core i9-14900HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,500 vs 19,643 (11.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14900HX vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+91% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 44,685 | 62,323+39% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 35,000 | 38,581+10% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,000+3% | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,500 | 19,643+12% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14900HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Core i9-14900HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14900HX) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM770,WM790 (Core i9-14900HX) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-14900HX) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-14900HX) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-14900HX targets Flagship Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-14900HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | true |
| Target Use | Flagship Gaming Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-14900HX launched at $668 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($668 vs $699), the Core i9-14900HX is $31 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14900HX delivers 66.9 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 28.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14900HX | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $668-4% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.9 | 89.2+33% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












