
Core i9-13980HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13980HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($668 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,950 vs 62,323).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.8 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 29.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 68.8 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌4.6% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$668 MSRP
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Core i9-13980HX
2023Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $31 less on MSRP ($668 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 120W, a 65W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 29.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 68.8 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $668 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (45,950 vs 62,323).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.8 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($668 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌4.6% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$668 MSRP
- ❌118.2% higher power demand at 120W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core i9-13980HX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13980HX | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13980HX | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 313 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 380 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 316 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13980HX | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 762 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 543 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 467 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 680 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 567 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 423 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 430 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13980HX | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1012 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 905 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 792 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 704 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 840 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 739 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 646 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 568 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 620 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 491 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13980HX and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core i9-13980HX
Core i9-13980HX
The Core i9-13980HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,950 points. Launch price was $668.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13980HX packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13980HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.5 GHz on the Core i9-13980HX versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 3.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i9-13980HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13980HX scores 45,950 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 30.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13980HX vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core i9-13980HX | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.5 GHz | 5.7 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+91% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 45,950 | 62,323+36% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13980HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i9-13980HX versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — the Core i9-13980HX supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-13980HX supports up to 192 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13980HX) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Raptor Lake-HX (Core i9-13980HX) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Core i9-13980HX | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+111900% | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 128 GB+69904967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13980HX) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (Core i9-13980HX) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13980HX rivals Ryzen 9 7945HX; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i9-13980HX | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13980HX launched at $668 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($668 vs $699), the Core i9-13980HX is $31 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13980HX delivers 68.8 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 25.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13980HX | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $668-4% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.8 | 89.2+30% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












