
Core i9-13905H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13905H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,384 vs 38,581).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅133.3% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Core i9-13905H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Core i9-13905H
2023Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅133.3% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (19,384 vs 38,581).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Core i9-13905H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core i9-13905H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 253 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 492 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 416 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 325 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 296 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 279 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 745 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 745 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 672 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 723 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 552 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13905H and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core i9-13905H
Core i9-13905H
The Core i9-13905H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1792. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 29,807 points. Launch price was $697.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13905H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13905H versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i9-13905H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13905H scores 29,807 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 70.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 19,384 vs 38,581 (66.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,300 vs 2,926, a 24% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,000 vs 19,643 (33.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13905H vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 32+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.7 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz+62% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+433% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 29,807 | 62,323+109% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 19,384 | 38,581+99% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,300 | 2,926+27% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,000 | 19,643+40% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13905H uses the FCBGA1792 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i9-13905H) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WM790,HM770 (Core i9-13905H) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1792 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 28+133% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13905H) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Iris Xe 96EU (Core i9-13905H) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13905H targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i9-13905H rivals Ryzen 9 7940HS; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i9-13905H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe 96EU | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












