PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-13900H

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $82 less on MSRP ($617 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,444 vs 62,323).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.5 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 100.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 44.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core i9-13900H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
13.3% HIGHER MSRP
$699 MSRPvs$617 MSRP
❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.

Core i9-13900H

2023

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $82 less on MSRP ($617 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Delivers 100.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 44.5 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $617 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core i9-13900H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,444 vs 62,323).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.5 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($617 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
13.3% HIGHER MSRP
$699 MSRPvs$617 MSRP
❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core i9-13900H?

Yes. Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 32.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 127.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 32.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 24 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the better fit. You are getting 127.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 433.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 13.3% more expensive on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $617 MSRP, and it gives you a 32.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.5% better value on MSRP (89.2 vs 44.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 24 MB and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 14/20. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i9-13900H Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 7950X3D Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	262 FPS	291 FPS
medium	253 FPS	265 FPS
high	210 FPS	219 FPS
ultra	180 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	223 FPS	275 FPS
medium	192 FPS	227 FPS
high	154 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	135 FPS	156 FPS
4K
low	154 FPS	190 FPS
medium	132 FPS	156 FPS
high	101 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	107 FPS

Open Core i9-13900H Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	636 FPS	734 FPS
medium	543 FPS	627 FPS
high	458 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	417 FPS	393 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	602 FPS
medium	492 FPS	536 FPS
high	416 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	357 FPS	326 FPS
4K
low	325 FPS	338 FPS
medium	296 FPS	305 FPS
high	279 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	246 FPS	229 FPS

Open Core i9-13900H Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	648 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	530 FPS	1122 FPS
high	467 FPS	1062 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	936 FPS
medium	491 FPS	845 FPS
high	427 FPS	775 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	574 FPS
medium	374 FPS	498 FPS
high	339 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	378 FPS

Open Core i9-13900H Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
1080p
low	686 FPS	1082 FPS
medium	686 FPS	973 FPS
high	686 FPS	854 FPS
ultra	672 FPS	766 FPS
1440p
low	686 FPS	853 FPS
medium	686 FPS	751 FPS
high	626 FPS	659 FPS
ultra	552 FPS	569 FPS
4K
low	555 FPS	623 FPS
medium	504 FPS	555 FPS
high	451 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	394 FPS	426 FPS

Open Core i9-13900H Open Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900H and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core i9-13900H

The Core i9-13900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,444 points. Launch price was $617.

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900H versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i9-13900H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900H scores 27,444 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 77.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900H vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.

Feature	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	16 / 32+14%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz	5.7 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	4.2 GHz+62%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+433%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm, 6 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
PassMark	27,444	62,323+127%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	38,581
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,926
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	19,643

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Socket	FCBGA1744	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-13900H) / true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core i9-13900H requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.

Feature	Core i9-13900H	Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	true

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i9-13900H launched at $617 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($617 vs $699), the Core i9-13900H is $82 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900H delivers 44.5 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 66.9% better value option.