
Core i9-13900E
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-13900E
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $145 less on MSRP ($554 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,000 vs 19,643).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($554 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 22.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌26.2% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$554 MSRP
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Core i9-13900E
2023Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $145 less on MSRP ($554 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 22.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 73.1 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $554 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (15,000 vs 19,643).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.1 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($554 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌26.2% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$554 MSRP
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core i9-13900E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 305 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 293 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1012 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 1012 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 977 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 838 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 991 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 881 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 793 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 656 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 599 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 519 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1012 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 1012 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 935 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 810 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 1010 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 881 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 761 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 756 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 662 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 578 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900E and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core i9-13900E
Core i9-13900E
The Core i9-13900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 40,476 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900E packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900E has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-13900E versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 1.8 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i9-13900E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900E scores 40,476 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 42.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,606 vs 2,926, a 11.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,000 vs 19,643 (26.8% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900E vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.7 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz+133% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 40,476 | 62,323+54% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,606 | 2,926+12% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 15,000 | 19,643+31% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900E) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W680,Q670,Z790,H770 (Core i9-13900E) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900E) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900E) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-13900E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Embedded | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-13900E launched at $554 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($554 vs $699), the Core i9-13900E is $145 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900E delivers 73.1 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 19.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $554-21% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 73.1 | 89.2+22% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












