
Core i9-12900KS
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-12900KS
2022Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (27,796 vs 38,581).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.9 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($739 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 150W vs 120W.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 58.9 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i9-12900KS
2022Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 58.9 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $739 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (27,796 vs 38,581).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 58.9 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($739 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌25% higher power demand at 150W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core i9-12900KS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 716 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 603 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 501 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 443 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 541 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 454 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 380 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 363 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 866 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 686 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 605 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 502 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 748 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 602 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 523 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 441 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 973 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 879 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 763 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 723 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 556 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-12900KS and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core i9-12900KS
Core i9-12900KS
The Core i9-12900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 43,528 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900KS packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core i9-12900KS versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 7.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i9-12900KS uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900KS scores 43,528 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 35.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 27,796 vs 38,581 (32.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,082 vs 2,926, a 33.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900KS vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz | 5.7 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+327% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 43,528 | 62,323+43% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 27,796 | 38,581+39% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,082 | 2,926+41% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900KS uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-12900KS) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1700 (Core i9-12900KS) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-12900KS) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — UHD 770 (Core i9-12900KS) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD 770 | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-12900KS launched at $739 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($739 vs $699), the Ryzen 9 7950X3D is $40 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-12900KS delivers 58.9 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 40.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-12900KS | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $739 | $699-5% |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.9 | 89.2+51% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












