
Core i9-10900E
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-10900E
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $211 less on MSRP ($488 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,332 vs 62,323).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.6 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($488 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +55.6% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 125.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 39.6 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌43.2% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$488 MSRP
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Core i9-10900E
2020Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $211 less on MSRP ($488 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +55.6% higher average FPS across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 125.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 39.6 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $488 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 45 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,332 vs 62,323).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.6 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($488 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌43.2% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$488 MSRP
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core i9-10900E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-10900E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-10900E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 359 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 419 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 317 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-10900E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 449 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 479 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 403 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 408 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-10900E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 483 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 483 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 483 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 389 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-10900E and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core i9-10900E
Core i9-10900E
The Core i9-10900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,332 points. Launch price was $488.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10900E packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core i9-10900E versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i9-10900E uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900E scores 19,332 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 105.3% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900E vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core i9-10900E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20 | 16 / 32+60% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 5.7 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+540% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020−2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 19,332 | 62,323+222% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10900E uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900E versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i9-10900E) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: LGA1200 (Core i9-10900E) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Core i9-10900E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900E) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i9-10900E) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i9-10900E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-10900E launched at $488 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($488 vs $699), the Core i9-10900E is $211 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-10900E delivers 39.6 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 76.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-10900E | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $488-30% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.6 | 89.2+125% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












