
Core i7-14701TE
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-14701TE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $307 less on MSRP ($392 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,519 vs 62,323).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 70.2 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($392 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +40.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 27.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 70.2 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $392 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌78.3% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$392 MSRP
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Core i7-14701TE
2024Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $307 less on MSRP ($392 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +40.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 27.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.2 vs 70.2 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $392 MSRP).
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,519 vs 62,323).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 70.2 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($392 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌78.3% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$392 MSRP
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core i7-14701TE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-14701TE | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 211 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-14701TE | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 364 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-14701TE | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 688 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 643 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 562 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 474 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 688 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 581 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 500 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 425 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-14701TE | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 688 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 688 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 688 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 687 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 688 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 688 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 621 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 549 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 568 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 516 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 462 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-14701TE and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core i7-14701TE
Core i7-14701TE
The Core i7-14701TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,519 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i7-14701TE packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-14701TE versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.1 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i7-14701TE uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-14701TE scores 27,519 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 77.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,781 vs 2,926, a 5.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14701TE vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core i7-14701TE | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.7 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+288% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 27,519 | 62,323+126% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,781 | 2,926+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-14701TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-14701TE supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-14701TE) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i7-14701TE) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X3D).
| Feature | Core i7-14701TE | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X3D supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-14701TE) vs true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-14701TE) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 7950X3D) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-14701TE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i7-14701TE rivals Ryzen Embedded 8000; Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i7-14701TE | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | true |
| Target Use | Embedded/Industrial | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-14701TE launched at $392 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. On MSRP ($392 vs $699), the Core i7-14701TE is $307 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-14701TE delivers 70.2 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 23.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-14701TE | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $392-44% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 70.2 | 89.2+27% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











