
Core i7-13800H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13800H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,349 vs 62,323).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core i7-13800H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Core i7-13800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Core i7-13800H
2023Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 120W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core i7-13800H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,349 vs 62,323).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7950X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $699 MSRP, while Core i7-13800H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌166.7% higher power demand at 120W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X3D better than Core i7-13800H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 223 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 615 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 465 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 602 FPS |
| medium | 468 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 398 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 1062 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 936 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 775 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 498 FPS |
| high | 338 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 289 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 659 FPS | 1082 FPS |
| medium | 659 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 659 FPS | 854 FPS |
| ultra | 659 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 659 FPS | 853 FPS |
| medium | 659 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 626 FPS | 659 FPS |
| ultra | 551 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 393 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13800H and Ryzen 9 7950X3D

Core i7-13800H
Core i7-13800H
The Core i7-13800H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 26,349 points. Launch price was $457.


Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13800H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i7-13800H versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 9.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i7-13800H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13800H scores 26,349 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 81.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13800H vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 32+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz | 5.7 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz+68% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+433% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 26,349 | 62,323+137% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,643 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13800H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 28 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-13800H) / true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core i7-13800H requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i7-13800H | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












